5/24/2023 0 Comments Martin heidegger rüdiger safranskifor Weatherspoon’s alleged improper business expense reimbursements. In 2012, Safranski asserted a claim against Duma Inc. In 2003, Weatherspoon employed Safranski as a software programmer and gave Safranski 20 percent of Duma Inc. (Duma Inc.) in 2001 to develop and patent video software. BACKGROUND Weatherspoon founded Duma Video Inc. We do not reach the remittitur issue because of our decision to reverse the summary judgment order due to Weatherspoon’s lack of standing. 1 Safranski also appeals the denial of his motion to remit the jury award to Weatherspoon. We hold that Weatherspoon lacks standing, and therefore we reverse and remand for entry of an order granting summary dismissal of Weatherspoon’s fraud claim.1 We also affirm the prejudgment interest award. Weatherspoon cross appeals a prejudgment interest award to Safranski. Alex Safranski appeals the trial court’s summary judgment order denying dismissal of Sultan Weatherspoon’s fraud claim. DUMA VIDEO, INC., a Washington corporation, and Sultan Weatherspoon, an individual, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Respondents/Cross-Appellants. 47716-5-II Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two JanuIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II ALEX SAFRANSKI, an individual No.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |